Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault.
Oh, an investigation by the NY Times...well that certainly settles it.
Nice work NY Times, but I have to wonder, Did the NY Times interview any of the survivors that the Justice and State Departments blocked access to...I'd be interested in hearing from them.
Did the NY Times interview any of the people that were there on the scene when it happened?
Did the NY Times interview the Guy that Obama wants to bring to Justice! And never did by the way!!
Or did the NY Times just listen to what Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice had to say?
Well, The New York Times has spoken... So I guess that’s all the rest of us need to know .
Or is the NY Tines just trying to save Hillary Clinton’s ass?
Any why, “What Does it Really Matter?” “What Difference Does it Make”?
And by the way, since when does investigation by the NY Times constitute a real investigation?
What exactly does it mean when Obama said " if you like your health
plan, you can keep it, period" "if you like your doctor, you can keep
him, period"
no "ifs", no conditions, no "if it isn't changed"
You can keep it, PERIOD!
Was that a lie? Yes, and he knew it was when he said it. He lied to
the American people in order to pass a bill that a majority of Americans
did not want.
The answer is obvious.
This is his bill so don't give me that he didn't know BS.
Wake the hell up America. Vote Republican or independent and insist that this disaster gets overturned.
That is what Obama said a few hours ago at a G20 press conference. I find
that statement to be frivolous. To put it in simplistic terms, Obama was
elected only because of his skin color and free government handouts. He
is now obsessed with the complete mess he’s created over Syria as it
threatens his self-image. Gadaffi, Mubarak and now Assad. Seems to be a
pattern here. Remove secular leaders to allow the Muslim Brotherhood to
get a foothold.
I disagree. Obama was elected only because of his skin color and re-elected because of the free government handouts.
Benghazi, Ft Hood, and Boston were al Qaeda operations....I don't know if I'd call that "on the run"?
Terrorism is far from over!
Tawana Brawley starts paying up after she falsely accused a Man of rape in 1987
After 26 years, Tawana Brawley typical liarberal has finally begun paying damages to Steven Pagones, a man she falsely accused of being among a group of men who raped her in 1987.
Brawley's payment comes in the form of nearly $3,800 in wage garnishments, Pagones told CNN Sunday. Brawley still owes Pagones more than $400,000 in defamation damages.
In fall 1987, Brawley, who is African-American, was found disheveled inside a trash bag with racial slurs written across her body in Wappingers Falls, New York. Brawley, then 15, claimed she was kidnapped and repeatedly raped by a group of white men.
In one of his first mainstream cases, activist Al Sharpton became Brawley's spokesman, staging rallies and calling for justice on her behalf.
When the case was brought before a grand jury, it concluded that Brawley had falsified the entire account.
Pagones, who was an assistant district attorney, filed a civil suit that named Brawley, Sharpton and Brawley's lawyers as defendants.
Sharpton has since paid his debt to Pagones. But Brawley, now 41 and a nurse living in Virginia, still owes Pagones more than $431,000.
The right believes in freedom (did the Nazi's provide freedom?)
The right believes in the individual (was there any individuality when the nation was goose-stepping for the "good" of Germany?)
The right believes in a government with limited power (did Hitler have limited power?)
