Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault.
Oh, an investigation by the NY Times...well that certainly settles it.
Nice work NY Times, but I have to wonder, Did the NY Times interview any of the survivors that the Justice and State Departments blocked access to...I'd be interested in hearing from them.
Did the NY Times interview any of the people that were there on the scene when it happened?
Did the NY Times interview the Guy that Obama wants to bring to Justice! And never did by the way!!
Or did the NY Times just listen to what Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice had to say?
Well, The New York Times has spoken... So I guess that’s all the rest of us need to know .
Or is the NY Tines just trying to save Hillary Clinton’s ass?
Any why, “What Does it Really Matter?” “What Difference Does it Make”?
And by the way, since when does investigation by the NY Times constitute a real investigation?